-
-
-
-
URL copied!
Architectural drift and erosion in software development can seriously impact the business and go-to-market strategy, causing delays, decreased quality, and even product failure. Companies must have processes and workflows in place to detect architectural gaps but historically, those manual checks have been time consuming and prone to human error.
In this paper, we explore the different types of manual architecture review and propose automated alternatives to reduce the time and resources required even while producing better outcomes. You’ll learn:
- What architecture drift and erosion are, and how they impact the business.
- How dependency analysis, peer reviews, and other manual inspections work.
- Why even though they catch issues not prevented through the application of best practice good architecture governance, manual reviews are not the ideal solution.
- Specific considerations to keep in mind around compliance, data security, DevOps, and more when evaluating architecture review solutions.
- What automating architecture checks may look like in a series of example use case scenarios.
Author
Top Insights
Best practices for selecting a software engineering partner
SecurityDigital TransformationDevOpsCloudMedia
My Intro to the Amazing Partnership Between the...
Experience DesignPerspectiveCommunicationsMediaTechnology
Adaptive and Intuitive Design: Disrupting Sports Broadcasting
Experience DesignSecurityMobilityDigital TransformationCloudBig Data & AnalyticsMediaTop Authors
AVP, Engineering
Director, Engineering
Senior Principal Architect
Senior Solution Architect, Technology
Associate Consultant
Let’s Work Together
Related Content
Retail as a Conspiracy
I was one of the early buyers of the first release of Apple Vision Pro AR headset early this year. I got up at 5am my time to place an order on-line at the first moment when the device became available for pre-order. I then made an appointment at my local brick-and-mortar Apple Store to … Continue reading Detecting Architectural Gaps with Automation →
Learn More
Intelligence is Intelligence, even if it’s Artificial
I had a stimulating conversation with the head of our GenAI practice, Suhail Khaki, a few weeks ago. Suhail made the remark that the more he works with GenAI, the more it strikes him that it’s less like conventional computer software, and more like a person in the way it interacts. He made the remark: … Continue reading Detecting Architectural Gaps with Automation →
Learn More
We’re getting the chance to live in the future
Early 20th Century motivational speaker and author Dale Carnegie once wrote “Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.” I believe that Mr. Carnegie’s point was that unless today is the literally the worst day of your life (and my sincere sympathies if it is), then the energy you spent worrying about it yesterday was largely wasted. I haven’t read much … Continue reading Detecting Architectural Gaps with Automation →
Learn More
Share this page:
-
-
-
-
URL copied!