Success Has Many Parents

Insight categories: InsightsPerspectiveTechnology

When we announced Hitachi鈥檚 agreement to acquire GlobalLogic for roughly $9.5B, a number of GlobalLogic alumni鈥攆ormer colleagues no longer with our company鈥攃ontacted me to offer congratulations. I鈥檓 happy to accept their good wishes, but I鈥檓 even more appreciative of the opportunity to thank them for the role they played in GlobalLogic鈥檚 success. It鈥檚 certainly true that the people now on-board (and of course our future new colleagues at Hitachi) are the ones who are most directly responsible for this milestone. But it鈥檚 also true that our colleagues, both current and former, brought us to the place where this success could happen.

Whenever a business celebrates a milestone, it鈥檚 not unusual to see lots of people congratulating each other鈥攐r even in some cases, jostling to take credit. When seeing this behavior, people sometimes cynically remark that, 鈥淪uccess has many parents, while failure is an orphan.鈥 Having myself been a part of several successes鈥攁s well as some failures鈥擨 feel that while that aphorism is correct, the cynicism behind it is wrong. Success really DOES have many parents鈥攁nd it doesn鈥檛 take much to cause a failure.

Case in Point: NeXT Software & Apple

Years ago, when I was working at NeXT Software, one of the product managers and myself teamed up to make a proposal that the whole executive team鈥攊ncluding NeXT CEO Steve Jobs鈥攊nitially opposed. We ended up convincing people, our proposal was implemented, and it turned out to be a success. Afterwards, Steve Jobs told me that if we had not implemented our proposal, NeXT would not have not had enough revenue to stay afloat and would have had to close down. This was in 1995, and because NeXT did stay in business, it was bought by Apple in 1996. Then Steve Jobs and the NeXT team joined Apple and鈥攖ogether with many other great people鈥攚ere able to turn Apple around.

Hard as it might be to believe today, Apple was in dire trouble before it bought NeXT, and many observers did not expect Apple to survive as an independent business. We can imagine several other ways Apple could have been saved. But it鈥檚 certainly true that had NeXT gone out of business in 1995, Apple was very unlikely to have bought it in 1996. And if Apple had not bought NeXT, then-NeXT CEO Steve Jobs would almost certainly never have had the opportunity to take on the Apple CEO role and drive the turnaround at Apple.

So, without me and my product manager colleague, Apple would not exist as the success it is today鈥攃orrect?

Vain as it might sound, I think that鈥檚 true. However, I also think it鈥檚 far from the whole truth. Mine was just one piece of a story where MANY things had to go right. Without Steve Jobs, obviously, there would be no Apple. Without the many other talented people who came to Apple from NeXT, there would be no Apple as we know it today. Without Apple鈥檚 then-board of directors agreeing to resign when Steve Jobs made that a condition of his becoming interim CEO, there would be no Apple. Without the NeXT founders, early engineers, great HR team, and many, many other people, there would have been no NeXT鈥攚hich means no NeXTSTEP (parent of OS X and iOS) and therefore no iPhone or Apple as they are today.

Similarly, without the many great people at Apple itself who built Apple into the company it was then and has become since, there would clearly be no Apple. All of these individuals and many others performed countless acts (known and unknown)鈥攅ach of which was critical to Apple鈥檚 becoming the company and shipping the products it does today.

The Formula for Success

Let’s express this concept mathematically by using the below symbols:

  • 聽鈥&鈥 means 鈥渓ogical ‘and’ “
  • 聽鈥渱鈥 means 鈥渓ogical ‘or’ 鈥
  • 聽鈥!鈥 means 鈥渓ogical ‘not’ 鈥

With these symbols, the formula for success could be written as:

  • “Success = A & B & C & D & E &鈥︹.

Each letter represents a critical success event that either happens or does not happen. In other words, for success, a long series of critical events all need to go right. We know from logic that the negation of this expression is:

  • 鈥!Success = !A | !B | !C | !D | !E |鈥︹.

In other words, to fail, only one of the critical events needs to go wrong.

In non-mathematical terms, to be successful requires that everything critical must happen. To fail, only one critical link needs to go wrong. That鈥檚 why failure is an orphan: since only one critical link in a long chain has to break, often no one even knows which specific thing it was. But for a success, it鈥檚 clear what went right: everything critical.

Success has so many 鈥減arents鈥 because there are so many links, each of which truly was critical. It鈥檚 not boasting to be proud of your 鈥渓ink鈥 or 鈥渓inks鈥濃攜ou have every reason to, because it鈥檚 absolutely true that without you, the success would not have happened. I鈥檓 proud of the role I played in Apple鈥檚 success, even though I鈥檓 not there anymore and haven鈥檛 been for a long time. When you feel this pride, the thing to keep in mind is that you are not alone; each person who made their own critical link happen also rightly 鈥渙wns鈥 the success, whether they came before you or after, and whether they are currently on-board that company or not. Success really does have many parents.

We Can All Be Critical Links

In the U.S., there鈥檚 a classic Christmas movie called 鈥淚t鈥檚 a Wonderful Life.鈥 Through divine intervention, the protagonist George Bailey is given the opportunity to see what the world would have been like had he never been born. His community is a profoundly different place, and he sees that the people around him and those he loves would have been much worse off without him. George Bailey is stunned by the magnitude of the impact his life has had. His protector, Clarence, tells him: 鈥淥ne man’s life touches so many others. When he’s not there, it leaves an awfully big hole.鈥

I don鈥檛 think the point of the movie is that George Bailey was single-handedly responsible for all the good that happened in his community. Rather, it is that George was a 鈥渃ritical link鈥 in many chains, each of which led to a good result. All it took was for one person鈥攐ne contribution鈥攖o be absent, and all those critical chains turned success into failure.

Similarly, we too have the opportunity to participate in the personal and business successes around us. The absence of our positive contribution can be all it takes to fail. As in the movie, we all have the opportunity to live a 鈥渨onderful life鈥 that completes the success chain for our companies, families, friends, and communities.

So as we celebrate this milestone for GlobalLogic, we acknowledge that there are many people whose actions鈥攕ome highly visible and others unknown today鈥攚ere responsible for achieving it. Some of these people are currently on-board, and some are no longer with us, but all who performed one of the many critical actions that got us to where we are today are contributors to this success. As fellow links in the chain, I would like to congratulate you all, and thank you for being co-parents of GlobalLogic鈥檚 success.


Globallogic blog success has many parents2


Dr. Jim Walsh


View all Articles

Trending Insights

If You Build Products, You Should Be Using Digital Twins

If You Build Products, You Should Be Using...

Digital TransformationTesting and QAManufacturing and Industrial


Retail After COVID-19: How Innovation is Powering the New Normal

Retail After COVID-19: How Innovation is Powering the...

Digital TransformationInsightsConsumer and Retail

Top Authors

Sonal Padole

Sonal Padole

Senior Project Manager

Vimal Dhale

Vimal Dhale

Senior Consultant Engineering

Arti Gupta

Arti Gupta

Sr. Manager, Engineering

Siddhi Thakkar

Siddhi Thakkar

Manager, Engineering

Neven Dima膷

Neven Dima膷

Software Engineer

All Categories

  • URL copied!